Posted 2/16/11 - Marina Lowe, Legislative & Policy Counsel with the ACLU of Utah, advised the House Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Committee of the dangers of enacting H.B. 70, "Illegal Immigration Enforcement Act," modeled on the controversial Arizona law SB 1070. Unfortunately, the bill passed out of committee and will now be debated on the House floor. |
The ACLU of Utah operates through public education, legal advocacy, litigation, and lobbying at both the state and local levels to ensure the constitutional rights and freedoms of everyone living in or visiting Utah. Our work is based on those principals outlined in the Bill of Rights.
Wednesday, February 16, 2011
Arizona Copy Cat Bill Advances Out of Committee
Equal Opportunity
Posted 2/14/11 - Listen to KRCL's RadioActive broadcast from Friday, 2/10, on Affirmative Action. Marina Lowe, legislative and policy counsel at the ACLU of Utah, joins Barry Gomberg, the director of affirmative action and equal opportunity at Weber State University, and Kim Hall, the assistant director of the Women's Resource Center at the University of Utah to discuss their predictions for the legislative session and the impact if a proposed constitutional amendment to exempt the state from federal affirmative action laws were to pass.
"Improperly motivated," Senator Urquhart's SB 55 would "compromise commerce and the government in Utah"
Posted 2/10/11 - The ACLU of Utah and cooperating attorney Brent V. Manning, who jointly represented independent candidate for governor Farley Anderson in the landmark case Anderson v. Bell, spoke today in opposition to a bill proposed by Senator Stephen Urquhart (SB 55, "Electronic Signatures") that would greatly restrict the ability of courts and all other "government agencies" to accept otherwise legal "e-signatures" from Utah residents and others. In an interview with Etopia News, Manning observed, "[U]nder the terms of S.B. 55, in order for a Utah court to enforce a contract sealed with an electronic signature, it would need to engage in a 'rule-making process' which, as a court, it is not able to do, since its function is to decide cases, not make rules. Thus, no electronic signature, or online purchase, or other electronically-agreed-to contract could be enforced in Utah courts. S.B. 55 'would completely invalidate all electronic transactions in Utah . . . . Every government department would have to engage in rule-making that would paralyze the process.'"
Thursday, February 10, 2011
TAKE ACTION: Stop H.B. 70, "Illegal Immigration Enforcement Act"
Contact the representatives who will be at the hearing and tell them to VOTE NO on the Arizona copycat bill!
Use these talking points in your communication with the Committee members.
HB 70 Talking Points:
Immigration policy has always been within the jurisdiction of the federal government. Legislation that creates immigration policy at the state and local levels is vulnerable to challenge in the courts.
We are not certain of the overall economic impact of immigration in Utah. We must not be hasty to implement laws that could have a negative impact on our already faltering economy. The experiences of other states such as Arizona tell us that this sort of legislation has a clear negative impact on the economy.
Please VOTE NO on HB 70!
Find out which Representatives are on the House Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Committee (Click on Committee Membership in the left hand column) >>
Read some general ACLU of Utah talking points on immigration legislation (PDF) >>
Busy Week At The Capital
Wednesday at the Capitol for The ACLU of Utah was supposed to be a busy day filled with committee hearings. Accordingly, we worked to prepare testimony and rally concerned citizens to attend hearings and voice opposition to very damaging legislation. However, in the early part of the morning it soon became clear that things had changed.
H.B. 70, Rep. Sandstrom’s bill modeled on Arizona’s SB 1070, was supposed to be heard in committee on Wednesday afternoon. At the last minute, this bill was removed from the committee’s agenda. There are many problems with H.B. 70, but the enormous fiscal note attached to his bill might be what caused Rep. Sandstrom to hold off on a hearing. The fiscal note puts an $11.3 million dollar burden on local governments and law enforcement. The bill will now be heard tomorrow in the House Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Committee. Please attend and voice your concerns about this harmful bill.
S.B. 138, sponsored by Sen. Urquhart is titled “Driver license qualification amendments,” and would eliminate the driver privilege card. The bill was heard in the Senate Transportation and Public Utilities and Technology Committee yesterday, and resulted in an interesting debate. Sen. Bramble openly opposed S.B. 138, joining others who believe the driver privilege card is a safe way to have information regarding who is driving on Utah roads, and to provide a means for all drivers to have car insurance. Unfortunately the committee passed S.B. 138 with a favorable recommendation. Now the bill moves to the Senate floor for debate.
Good news in the Capitol came as S.B. 152, Sex Offender Restriction Amendments, was tabled which means it will not be heard on the floor this session. Another piece of good news is that H.B. 182, a bill that would void any contract, arrangement or transaction if found to be against public policy, was pulled from the agenda in the House Judiciary Committee yesterday.
Stay tuned for more information on these bills and many more. We will remain vigilant in lobbying against bills that are unconstitutional and unnecessary, and we will continue to support legislation that protects the civil liberties of all Utahns.
Tuesday, February 8, 2011
Legislative Updates and Action Alerts
Rep. Chrsitensen's HB 18, "Voiding Transactions Against Public Policy," will be heard tomorrow in the House Judiciary Committee at 4pm. Should the state of Utah be interfering with YOUR right to contract? Tell the representatives to VOTE NO on HB 182!
Rep. Sandstrom's HB 70, "Illegal Immigration Enforcement Act," is going to be heard in the House Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Committee tomorrow at 4pm (PM/25 House Building). Show up early to fill the committee room. Contact the representatives who will be at the hearing and tell them to VOTE NO on the Arizona copycat bill!
Find out which Representatives are on the Committee (Click on Committee Membership in the left hand column) >>
Read some ACLU talking points on immigration legislation (PDF) >>
Read some ACLU talking points on immigration legislation (PDF) >>
Senator Dayton's SB 44, "State Commission Amendments," is headed for the House. This dangerous bill restricts the ability of the Constitutional Revision Commission (CRC) to make recommendations about proposed constitutional amendments. Is this retribution for the CRC's consideration of the affirmative action bill last year? Contact your representative now and tell them to VOTE NO on SB 44!
Read a Salt Lake Tribune Op Ed >>
Monday, February 7, 2011
Keeping You Informed
Today was an incredibly disappointing day at the Capital. S.B. 62, an adoption bill that would allow for second parent adoption, was tabled in the Senate Health and Human Services Committee. This bill would have made it possible for an unmarried adult to adopt the biological or legally adopted child of his or her cohabitating partner. With so many children living in Utah without parents, it is extremely sad to see the legislature act against such needed legislation. We will continue to strive for equal rights for all Utahns, including the right to live with whomever one chooses and to raise a family.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)